Letters / ‘A sad day for many’
The announcement of the completion of Viking wind farm and inter-connector project with an official switch on to follow next week is a sad day for many people now forced to live in close proximity to it.
We hoped that we would never see this day and that a more rational approach to energy supply would ensure that more reliable and cheaper forms of energy would be supported instead.
The impact of this wind farm on our landscape is plain for all to see and the environmental damage caused by its construction is very concerning.
The news this week that Viking is already earning constraint payments indicates that SSE’s main motivation for this wind farm is money. Under the smokescreen of renewable energy, the main driver for Viking has always been this.
It is very depressing to read SSE’s future plans for Shetland. One would think that they have assumed total control here, just like a dictatorship.
Benefits to Shetland will be minimal; this is all about profits for SSE and their shareholders. Shetlanders will rue the day that the Shetland Islands Council became involved with SSE as a temporary business partner all those years ago.
It remains to be seen if health issues emerge when the wind farm is fully operational. Even in the commissioning phase there has been an official complaint about noise from the turbines. The only consolation is that the turbines may be off for a significant amount of time when the power from Viking cannot be accommodated on the energy network.
However, we are where we are, and we now have a wind farm where the construction costs must make it one of the most expensive onshore windfarms anywhere, if the costs of connecting it to the energy network are included.
These costs will eventually be recouped from energy consumers in the form of higher bills. Renewable energy does not come cheap, regardless of government assurances to the contrary.
In spite of SSE’s best efforts with ‘sweeteners’ and glossy brochures the Viking Energy wind farm is despised by many in the communities affected.
Viking wind farm is likely to remain controversial for a long time into the future.
Frank Hay
Chair
Sustainable Shetland
See also:
SSE claims £2m in constraint payments as ‘consumers pay to keep the Viking wind farm idle’
Become a supporter of Shetland News
Shetland News is asking its many readers to consider start paying for their dose of the latest local news delivered straight to their PC, tablet or mobile phone.
Journalism comes at a price and because that price is not being paid in today’s rapidly changing media world, most publishers - national and local - struggle financially despite very healthy audience figures.
Most online publishers have started charging for access to their websites, others have chosen a different route. Shetland News currently has over 630 supporters who are all making small voluntary financial contributions. All funds go towards covering our cost and improving the service further.
Your contribution will ensure Shetland News can: -
- Bring you the headlines as they happen;
- Stay editorially independent;
- Give a voice to the community;
- Grow site traffic further;
- Research and publish more in-depth news, including more Shetland Lives features.
If you appreciate what we do and feel strongly about impartial local journalism, then please become a supporter of Shetland News by either making a single payment or monthly subscription.
Support us from as little as £3 per month – it only takes a minute to sign up. Thank you.
Already a supporter? Sign in to hide this message.
