widget/exchange-29
widget/exchange-30widget/exchange-33
widget/exchange-31

News / All options open for Sullom Voe port

A ship to ship transfer at Sullom Voe. Photo John Bateson

THE SALE of the port of Sullom Voe to a private company will remain an option after a tetchy debate inside Shetland Islands Council this week.

Councillors are examining the future of the port that has brought hundreds of millions of pounds into council coffers over the past 30 years, but whose golden days are over.

Uncertainty about its future viability is growing after BP ‘s shock decision last week that its Schiehallion production west of Shetland will bypass Sullom Voe.

This follows Fairfield Energy’s decision in May to decommission its Dunlin field, which feeds Sullom Voe via the Brent pipeline.

Some industry chiefs fear a “domino effect” that could make the Brent pipeline unviable.

Price Waterhouse Coopers (PwC), who are carrying out the SIC study, estimate the port will generate a net income of £338 million for the council until 2035.

However if the council retains control of the port after that it will have to subsidise it to the tune of £180 million until 2050, they say.

offset-carousel/post-mobile/0

Councillors agree that subsidy is not an option and are calling on the oil industry to open up about their plans for Shetland.

In response, terminal operators BP insist their commitment to Sullom Voe remains as strong as ever with the multi billion investment in the Clair Ridge project.

PwC propose four options for the port:

• continuing council ownership with improved efficiency and activity;
• creating an arms length public body to run it more effectively and efficiently;
• contracting a private port operator to run it commercially; or
• selling off a stake or the whole of the port to a private operator.

PwC say all the options have potential, but Shetland North councillors Andrea Manson and Alastair Cooper want the sell off option removed.

After a heated debate during which Cooper described council leader Gary Robinson as “ignorant”, the pair lost the vote convincingly by 14:4.

Become a member of Shetland News

 

Afterwards Manson said she did not believe a sell off would ever be seriously considered, and thought the idea should have been dumped altogether by this stage.

“We have to be seen to be working shoulder to shoulder with the oil industry to be encouraging more business for the port, rather than having the threat of selling it to a third party hanging over everyone’s head,” she said.

Robinson retorted that there was such a degree of uncertainty over the port’s future that everything had to be considered.

“If the port can’t be self sustaining then we have to consider that option (of selling it).”

Both councillors agreed that the industry itself should be more open about their plans for the future, after the SIC was stung by being excluded from any discussion about the future of Schiehallion oil, which has provided 40 per cent of the port’s income.

offset-carousel/post-mobile/1

In two weeks the council will start negotiating next years harbour dues for the port, which will no doubt rise to take into account the loss of Schiehallion business.

The £90,000 cost of the PwC study, which is due to be completed in the second half of next year, will also be factored in to cover its cost over the next two years.

Meanwhile the oil industry has admitted it was caught off guard by the sheer cost and complexity of developing oil and gas fields west of Shetland.

Total’s outgoing UK managing director Phillipe Guys said recently that in hindsight they would have scaled down the size of their new gas plant that is on the verge of completion at Sullom Voe.

He described the entire Laggan-Tormore development that will feed the gas plant as “a masterpiece of engineering”, but admitted “we would probably do things differently right now in the sense of maybe not building the plant as big”.

Become a member of Shetland News

Shetland News is asking its many readers to consider paying for membership to get additional features and services: -

  • Remove non-local ads;
  • Bookmark posts to read later;
  • Exclusive curated weekly newsletter;
  • Hide membership messages;
  • Comments open for discussion.

If you appreciate what we do and feel strongly about impartial local journalism, then please become a member of Shetland News by either making a single payment, or setting up a monthly, quarterly or yearly subscription.

 
Categories
widget/exchange-62widget/pd_widget-6widget/exchange-53widget/pd_widget-7widget/exchange-63widget/exchange-54widget/pd_widget-8widget/exchange-55widget/pd_widget-9widget/exchange-56

Newsletters

Subscribe to a selection of different newsletters from Shetland News, varying from breaking news delivered on the minute, to a weekly round-up of the opinion posts. All delivered straight to your inbox.

Daily Briefing Newsletter Weekly Highlights Newsletter Opinion Newsletter Life in Shetland Newsletter

JavaScript Required

We're sorry, but Shetland News isn't fully functional without JavaScript enabled.
Head over to the help page for instructions on how to enable JavaScript on your browser.

Your Privacy

We use cookies on our site to improve your experience.
By using our service, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy.

Browser is out-of-date

Shetland News isn't fully functional with this version of .
Head over to the help page for instructions on updating your browser for more security, improved speed and the best overall experience on this site.

Interested in Notifications?

Get notifications from Shetland News for important and breaking news.
You can unsubscribe at any time.

Have you considered becoming a member of Shetland News?

If you appreciate what we do and feel strongly about impartial local journalism, then please consider paying for membership and get the following features and services: -

  • Remove non-local ads;
  • Bookmark posts to read later;
  • Exclusive curated weekly newsletter;
  • Hide membership messages;
  • Comments open for discussion.