Letters / OSCR looks a proper Charlie
With regard to Shetland Charitable Trust reform (Regulator approves charitable trust reform, SN, 4 July 2012), OSCR says it is not up to them to decide whether election or selection of the majority of trustees was the most superior method. That being the case it should be a relatively simple matter to review this and hold a public vote on how we want our board of trustees constituted.
They also re-iterated that governance must change as the current constitution created “irreconcilable conflicts of interest and resulted in public mistrust of decisions taken on behalf of the trust”. I completely agree…. so where was OSCR on the 28 June? (The trust’s decision to grant £6.3 million to the Viking Energy wind farm project)
In reply to my query for their opinion on the 28 June meeting I received the following:
‘Dear Mr Fox
Shetland Charitable Trust – SC027025
Thank you for your emails of 22 and 25 June in relation to the forthcoming meeting of the Trust.
We have considered the legal advice provided by Turcan Connell on 20 June and 25 June and believe that the issues regarding conflict of interest have been adequately covered in this advice.
While we note your concern about having a personal conflict of interest as a result of your previous relationship with Sustainable Shetland, we consider there to be a distinction between a conflict of interest and a difference of opinion on a particular issue, with the latter not impinging on an individual’s ability to participate in a decision regarding that issue – this appears to be confirmed by the advice of 25 June.
You also question whether the investment in Viking passes the charity test. It is our understanding that SCT’s involvement with Viking Energy is as an investment destination for its funds, rather than as an activity which is directly meant to further its charitable purposes. As such, any decisions on whether to invest further will depend on whether the charity trustees feel such investment is in the interests of the charity, rather than whether it relates to SCT’s charitable purposes. The issues of possible disbenefit which you raise may of course be relevant factors in coming to a view on whether the investment is in the interests of the charity, on the grounds that any disbenefit which you might be able to identify might impact adversely on SCT’s beneficiaries and its reputation.’
I would contend that, if OSCR could not find any conflict of interest with the 28 June meeting, then I doubt if they can have any issue with the governance of the trust, in essence I believe OSCR has looked a proper Charlie with their contrary views on the trust’s governance.
Trust governance must change for the Shetland public’s sake and it must be democratic but I do not think the trust need worry about OSCR, they appear to be toothlessly inconsistent.
Billy Fox
Shetland Charitable Trust beneficiary
Quarff
Become a member of Shetland News
Shetland News is asking its many readers to consider paying for membership to get additional features and services: -
- Remove non-local ads;
- Bookmark posts to read later;
- Exclusive curated weekly newsletter;
- Hide membership messages;
- Comments open for discussion.
If you appreciate what we do and feel strongly about impartial local journalism, then please become a member of Shetland News by either making a single payment, or setting up a monthly, quarterly or yearly subscription.
Already a member? Sign in to hide this message.
