Letters / Fait accompli?
Viking Energy is a company owned by Shetland Charitable Trust (SCT) and private investors. Together with their partners Scottish and Southern Energy (SSE) they intend to build a windfarm across central mainland consisting of one hundred and three 145m (475ft) tall industrial sized turbines.
The Scottish Government’s guidelines on proximity of turbines, as clarified by the Directorate for the Built Environment, state that “in all instances, proposals should not be permitted if they would have a significant long term detrimental impact on the amenity of people living nearby. This principle applies to houses within and outwith 2km (1.2miles) of the proposed development and regardless of whether they are single dwellings or part of a settlement.”
In England and Wales this is becoming a law. In Shetland about seventy-one of the turbines will be built less than 2km from houses, some will be built less than 1.1km away. Leaving all other considerations aside, this fact and this fact alone should have at the very least triggered a Public Local Inquiry.
Industrial sized machines in an industrial sized windfarm will bring industrial sized problems. There is no doubt that large numbers of turbines located this close to dwellings will have a physical and psychological impact on the residents. The SIC’s own planning department, after a long and detailed professional analysis, rejected Viking Energy’s plans. Viking Energy publicly stated that a world class Health Impact Assessment (HIA) was ongoing and would be completed, yet this was abandoned before any results were published. You will have to ask yourself why?
Despite this, just nine SIC councillors carried the vote to block a Public Local Inquiry. All SIC/SCT Councillor/Trustees, whether they thought they had a conflict of interest or not, had a duty to represent the concerns of those residents within the 2km zones. By not asking hard questions about the location of turbines and the HIA all the dual role SIC/SCT Councillor/Trustees failed those residents and their duty to the SCT. Subsequently the SNP government’s energy minister Fergus Ewing also decided against a Public Local Inquiry.
Thanks to them the windfarm is still the ‘wrong project in the wrong place’. This is not just about environment or democracy or numbers for or against ‘the windfarm’; this is about getting it right where people’s health, wellbeing and property is concerned.
SNP minister Ewing’s consent decision was of course purely political and he hides the real reason for his decision behind the actions of the ‘SIC nine’. Ewing’s decision not to hold a PLI has gone completely unchallenged by our Liberal Democrat MSP and MP, who are also failing to represent the very real fears and concerns of their constituents.
To me the saddest thing of all is the selfish, rabid comments now being expressed by ‘windfarm supporters’, Viking Energy and SSE, and not a thought is spared by any of them for the wellbeing of those that will be surrounded by turbine clusters. I don’t believe Ewing’s decision is a fait accompli and it should be rigorously challenged by all fair minded folk whether they believe in a large windfarm for Shetland or not.
Allen Fraser
Meal
Hamnavoe
Burra
Become a member of Shetland News
Shetland News is asking its many readers to consider paying for membership to get additional features and services: -
- Remove non-local ads;
- Bookmark posts to read later;
- Exclusive curated weekly newsletter;
- Hide membership messages;
- Comments open for discussion.
If you appreciate what we do and feel strongly about impartial local journalism, then please become a member of Shetland News by either making a single payment, or setting up a monthly, quarterly or yearly subscription.
Already a member? Sign in to hide this message.
